Estate Planning
Why Might a
Client Desire a Revocable Living Trust?
Here are some reasons why you might want to establish a
revocable living trust.
1. Avoiding Probate
The main reason that most of our
clients establish a revocable living trust is to avoid
having the probate court involved after their death. In
Lake County the probate court fee will be over $200 and
the fee to publish a claim notice in a local newspaper
for 3 consecutive weeks as required by Illinois law is
less than $200. The attorney handling the probate
estate will make 2
or more court appearances before the probate judge, once
to open the estate and once to close the estate (with
possibly other appearances if needed).
If a person dies individually owning real
estate in more than one state at
the time of his/her death, then there could be more than
one probate estate opened (because a probate judge in
Illinois has no jurisdiction over real estate in another
state).
2. Privacy
A trust doesn’t have to be filed with the
probate court, whereas a will does have to be filed
after a person’s death.
3. Avoiding the need to inform heirs
If there is a probate proceeding, then all of
the heirs need to receive specific information and
documents relating to the probate proceeding. (An
“heir” is a person who would inherit if there were no
valid will.) If the
heirs’ addresses are unknown and cannot be easily
determined, then an additional newspaper notice will
have to be published to “give the heirs notice”. This
notice is an additional cost. If the heirs reside
overseas, the embassy or consulate of that country may
need to be contacted.
4.
The trust can be named as a beneficiary of life
insurance or other assets (such as an IRA or an annuity)
that pass by a beneficiary form. This can help to make
sure that particular contingent beneficiaries (such as
grandchildren) are not disinherited. If you have only
one beneficiary to help, and such beneficiary is
receiving government benefits such as Medicaid or SSI,
then you don’t want to name the person as a direct
beneficiary; it would be better to name such person as
the beneficiary of your trust (and have your trust
become a special needs trust at your death) and then
name the trust as the beneficiary of the life insurance,
IRA, annuity, or other benefit.
Example 1: Donna names her three
children Alice, Bob, and Carl as beneficiaries of her
life insurance policy. The beneficiary form doesn’t
give Donna a place to state that the distribution to the
children should be “per stirpes”, which is the
distribution that Donna wants. If any of the children
die before Donna, it is her desire that the children of
such deceased child receive the share that the deceased
child would have received (that is a “per stirpes”
distribution). Alice has one child: Alan. Bob has 2
children: Beth and Brenda. Carl doesn’t have any
children (and none are born before he dies).
If
Carl dies before Donna and the life insurance proceeds
all go to Alice and Bob that is okay, because that is
what Donna wants. If Alice dies before Donna, the life
insurance proceeds go 50% to Bob and 50% to Carl, that
isn’t what Donna desires (Donna wants Alice’s share to
go to Alice’s son Alan).
Example 2: Ellen names her revocable
trust as the beneficiary of her life insurance
proceeds. The trust states that Ellen’s three children
(Alex, Ben, and Connie) are the beneficiaries. The
distribution is to the 3 children per
stirpes (meaning that if a child dies before Ellen, such
deceased child’s children receive the share designated
for the deceased child). Thus there is no
risk that grandchildren will be mistakenly disinherited
because the life insurance beneficiary form doesn’t
allow a per stirpes distribution.
5.
Avoiding the potential problem of one death after the
other which
can cause a distribution of assets that may not meet
your desires
Example: Dennis names his 2 children
(Adam and Barry) as equal beneficiaries of his life
insurance proceeds. If one of Dennis’ sons dies before
him, Dennis desires that the share designated for such
deceased child be paid to the children of such deceased
child (per stirpes distribution). Adam doesn’t have any
children. Barry has a daughter named Dawn. Adam has a
wife named Wilma (who is the sole primary beneficiary of
Adam’s will). Barry has a wife named Wendy (who is the
sole primary beneficiary of Barry’s will).
Dennis and his sons are
driving together in the same car. There is an accident.
Dennis dies at the scene of the accident. Adam and
Barry are taken to the hospital. Adam dies that
evening. Barry dies 2 days later. At the time of
Dennis’ death, Adam and Barry were alive and became
entitled to receive the $100,000 life insurance policy
that Dennis had. When Adam died, his wife Wilma became
his beneficiary (and the life insurance proceeds Adam
“received” from his father Dennis then go to Wilma per
the instructions of Adam’s will). When Barry died, his
wife Wendy became his beneficiary
(and the life insurance proceeds Barry “received” from
his father Dennis then go to Wendy per the instructions
of Barry’s will). Dennis (looking down from heaven) is
not happy that Wilma got one-half of the insurance
proceeds. Dennis is happy that Wendy got one-half of
the insurance proceeds (because Wendy is raising Dennis’
grandchild Dawn).
6.
If you desire not to give your spouse the
percentage that your spouse would otherwise receive
under your will (in Illinois that is one-half if you
die without any descendants surviving you, or one-third
if you die with a descendant surviving you), then you
could have your assets in a revocable trust (because
your spouse doesn’t have the right to receive a specific
percentage of the trust assets – unless you have a
premarital agreement that states your spouse is entitled
to receive a particular percentage or dollar amount of
your assets). Thus you can use a revocable living
trust to disinherit your spouse (or reduce the
percentage/amount that you
give to your spouse if your spouse survives you).
What if I enter a nursing home and apply for Medicaid
benefits, and at such time my home (or other real
estate) is owned by a “revocable” living trust?
Owning your real estate in a “revocable” living trust
doesn’t provide protection from nursing home
expenses. For example: Joe is a widower (or single
or divorced) and he enters a nursing home owning a house
in his revocable trust. Joe applies for Medicaid
benefits to pay for his nursing home care. If he
qualifies for Medicaid, then after he has been in a
nursing home for 100 days, the State of Illinois will
place a lien against his home (filing the lien paperwork
with the county recorder) so that if the home is sold
during Joe’s lifetime, then Illinois must be paid back
what money it has spent on his nursing home care. Or
after Joe’s death, when the home is sold, then Illinois
must be paid back what money it has spent on his nursing
home care. {If Joe has a wife who is residing in the
home, then the State can’t place a lien against the
home. But if the wife dies, and Joe then becomes the
sole owner of the home, then the State can place the
lien against the home.)